sistermagpie: Classic magpie (Onibaba)
sistermagpie ([personal profile] sistermagpie) wrote2005-09-07 05:02 pm
Entry tags:

Severus Black

I have this post on Sirius and Regulus and East of Eden I keep thinking about putting up. I think the trouble with it is that I can't stop babbling in it, just wandering off and wondering how things could be, given that we have zero to no canon about them.

Today, though, I was thinking about

In an interview about Six Feet Under Alan Ball, rather wonderfully, referred to the character of Rico Diaz as the tragically underappreciated adopted son or something to that affect. I loved that because I thought that was absolutely true--Rico was brought into the business by Nathaniel Fisher, Sr. He was the most interested in Fisher & Sons, the business, and he was the most talented (he was an artist at reconstruction). Yet he could never quite be part of the family, and so part of the business. In a very real way he was one of the the "Sons" of Fisher & Sons, but was never really seen that way. Mostly the way he was treated as a son, imo, was to be resented by the real sons when they felt inadequate.

That made me think about how I always felt Krycek was a lot like that in The X-files. Mulder and Spender were both the legitimate sons of Bill Mulder and CSM (or both of CSM, damn you, Chris Carter), and Krycek was the outsider fighting his way into the Conspiracy. Although Krycek was more determined and willing, it was Mulder and Spender who were the desirable ones because they were blood.

So what does that have to do with Snape? Well, nothing. Or not much, exactly. It's just that I was thinking about Snape and Sirius. The two characters have a pretty intense relationship in canon. We are first told by DD in PS/SS that Snape hates Harry because he and Harry's father hated each other. Certainly Snape hates Harry because he reminds him of James, and both Sirius and Snape are accused of mistaking Harry for his father. So while James and Sirius were best friends, and Snape and James hated each other, James also provides a sort of focal point around which Sirius and Snape hate each other.

However, since I'm somebody who really likes family sagas, and in HP I think all the family sagas are the tragedies on the Dark Side of the book (the Weasleys have their drama and their dysfunction, but it's mostly rooted in the present...it's just not the operatic drama of the Blacks), I can't help but think about Snape as a Black. Sirius leaves his family and is blasted off the family tree. He goes to a family on the "good" side, the Potters, and they become his family. In the present time Sirius is considered a member of that family, I would say.

But what about Snape? The post-HBP interest in Regulus begs the question of what, if any, relationship Snape and Regulus had. Regulus was the son who stayed on the family tree. Even after rejecting the DEs, he was still a loyal Black as far as we know. They were both DEs together. HBP makes a point of bringing Regulus into the fold, even if you don't think he is R.A.B. (which I think he is). Slughorn first brings him up as a Slytherin, "I got [Sirius'] brother Regulus when he came along." (He sees the Black boys as "a matched set.") I can't find the other quote, but I know there's somewhere where someone says that Regulus only lived a few days after leaving the DEs. Iow, although we never heard of the lad before OotP, everyone is on a first name basis with him. Well, that's part of the fun of a coming-of-age mystery. All the adults know more than you do, because they were all alive then. How was Harry to know he should worry about Regulus when he didn't know he existed, and then when he did know Sirius acted like he wasn't important?

It becomes very tempting to imagine Snape, who is the same age as Sirius, replacing him in a way in the family's eyes. We have no evidence that Regulus looked at Snape the way he had at Sirius, but there's just something interesting about Snape being at Grimmauld Place given that he was (or is) more in line with what the house represents. (It adds some nice possibilities for the fact he won't stay for dinner.)

The main reason for thinking of it is that in HBP Snape *is* there helping the Blacks. Narcissa (Black) Malfoy comes to him for help protecting her son (also a Black). Snape and Bellatrix (Black) LeStrange seem to know each other very well. Narcissa references Snape's friendship with Lucius (Sirius had earlier called Snape Lucius' lapdog), but while we know he and Lucius have a relationship it's the Blacks with whom Snape seems the most bound up: Draco, Narcissa, Bellatrix and Sirius. Snape may not be "family" in their Pureblood eyes, but their ties seem almost as close. Had Sirius not been a "blood traitor" he might have been the one his cousin, Narcissa, went to for protection for her son as head of the family. He might have been the one sniping with Bellatrix. (I can see him making a UV as well, if not necessarily this one.) Harry tells us Snape seems to like Draco the very first day of class. Has he met him before? Is it just that Draco was Lucius' son, or is Snape close with Draco's family? And by Draco's family, I mostly mean the Blacks, since those are the relatives we usually see in canon? This storyline is a family drama, with Voldemort being simply the outside influence. In fact, Voldemort seems to spend the whole year picking on Draco.

It makes me wonder, thinking back on OotP, if Snape ever spent time in the house at Grimmauld Place the way Sirius stayed with the Potters. He wasn't best buddies with Regulus as far as we know, but he may have gotten involved with the whole family during Voldemort's first rise. Fanon has often named Snape Draco's godfather and while this might not be literally true he is rather acting as one in HBP.

Maybe the other reason I wonder about this comes down to house elves. Besides being hilarious when he waxed rhapsodic over Draco's bone structure in HBP, Kreacher was also very serious in considering him a Black. Dobby betrayed the Malfoys to serve Harry Potter; Kreacher betrayed Sirius and would love to serve the last of the Blacks. I think maybe it's the fact that I think of Kreacher as part of the Black family that made me start thinking about Snape this way.

Snape may be a Prince, but he's a half-blood. He's not married--Pureblood ideology makes it impossible for him to marry himself into the kind of family he supported as a DE. But that doesn't mean he didn't fashion himself some place in that family. It's interesting for me to think that that might drive some of his confrontations with Sirius as well. Sirius may have left his family behind and said good riddance, but would he really like the idea of Snape getting a spot in it? I don't think it's too wild an idea to think that Snape would have coveted a spot in that family. He was a DE, he supported the ideology (I don't think you can surgically remove Pureblood Mania from the DE ideology so that Snape's not a bigot), he used Mudblood as an insult at least once. Sirius compares him to a Pureblood's lapdog. The name Half-blood Prince could mean he's a Prince among half-bloods, or it can also be Snape claiming a place for himself in the wizarding side of his family. He's a half-blood, but he's still a Prince. He did perhaps want a wizard family. (Can't blame the man there--look at Harry and Hermione!)

I have no idea what really went on. It just seems like there's some good potential for something in the fact that Snape plays such a huge part in the Black family drama of HBP, taking over as the patriarch in some ways, when Sirius was so defined by being an Outsider. Not that Snape's role goes completely smoothly. Bellatrix is obviously suspicious of him, but more on Voldemort's behalf. Draco is potentially even more interesting on that score, since just as Snape steps into a father's role Draco becomes rebellious and suspicious. One wonders if there's a "you're not my father!" lurking there somewhere, with Draco projecting some of his anger about his father onto Snape. I've always liked the fact that when Snape and Draco argue the thing that makes Draco lose it and stomp off in a huff is when Snape responds to his claim that Snape is trying to steal his glory by saying he knows Draco is upset about his father. Seems like Snape doesn't buy that glory stuff either.

Anyway, I guess I haven't actually said anything. It's just an interesting aspect to Snape and Sirius' relationship. In the fight between the two in OotP, Sirius, in one of his Black-est (and Draco-ish) moments, leans back in his chair lazily and, speaking to the ceiling, says, "You know, I think I'd prefer it if you didn't give orders here, Snape. It's my house, you see." This creates an "ugly flush" in Snape's pallid face. He then becomes quietly waspish, and hits Sirius with the charge of being useless. Harry later remembers this and claims Snape goaded Sirius into leaving the house, implying he was a coward. It's certainly true that this is Sirius' sore spot. Could Snape have pulled it out because Sirius had hit his own sore spot by claiming the Black House as his own and speaking to Snape like an unworthy guest in it? Not even a poor relation? That ugly flush seems a bit much for the remark Sirius made otherwise, at least to me. Perhaps Sirius was really was pulling out the Pureblood Black card, without Harry realizing it. If Snape longed to be a real Black, I could certainly see Sirius mocking him about it.

[identity profile] seductivedark.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe not, then. As you say, Snape and Sirius are two different people.

But, on the other side, JKR appears to place near-parallels (sp?) into her work. The surface Sirius & Harry, and the surface Snape & Draco, both go that direction, to me. A near-parallel would of course mean differences - the affection behind both adults' motivations while not the 'confusing with the lost friend' part, seems to work. And, it helps support a non-romantic reading of Spinner's End.

And I'm about drowning in romantic speculation any more. Maybe I'll get an avatar one day that reads 'Sea-sick of Ships'.
ext_6866: (Yum!)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sure "Jacob Have I Loved," by you, was a big reason I started thinking about this! I think Sirius would be a huge thing for Snape and Regulus to bond over. But thinking about it, I can imagine that Snape would realize that he would have to be careful, because I think no matter how much Regulus hated Sirius he was still his brother. Snape would probably realize this--there would be lines he couldn't cross regarding Sirius with Regulus, which might make him even more annoyed at Sirius.

I definitely see Sirius as very much a Black, even if he was publically against them. Well, we see this all the time in the world. Despite Sirius sneering at the idea that being a Black makes you practically royalty, Sirius often *does* act like the aristocrat he is. He's not even aware of it half the time. I think Snape's all too aware of that.
ext_6866: (Cousins)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You could probably write the whole of Snape's life with narrative around moments defined by some of Blacks.

Isn't it? It makes the first year so much more interesting. Harry turns up, yes, but then so does a new Black. I can definitely see Snape loving taking Regulus under his wing when he and Sirius were on the outs--and Regulus would probably like Sirius to see that knowing how Sirius hated Snape as well.

I can't see Snape being "adopted" in the Black family tree in the same fashion as Sirius was by the Potters; but I could see him close to them, he definitly managed it with the Malfoy part of the family tree.

Yes, that's what I see too. It's not like Sirius with the Potters...though that's also interesting because in a way it's even more binding. It doesn't seem like it was ever about Snape wanting a family in terms of wanting somebody else's parents. Also it's kind of interesting that Sirius ultimately "fails" the Potter family and gets labelled the big traitor, the outcast. Even when he gets out of jail people tend to remind him that he's *not* Harry's family. With Snape, although he's never openly considered family, everybody goes to him.

I'm still wondering if Tonks' "Black"ness will play out at some point, and how.

I wonder that too. When I was flipping through the book looking for that other Reg quote I couldn't find I was surprised to see Tonks refer to Draco as "that Malfoy boy." It's perfectly correct for her to call him that, it just suddenly struck me how they're cousins but she sees him as a complete stranger. That's the thing about Tonks, for me, that so far she's a Black in blood but in really no other way, because she's been brought up outside that world.

(by the way, seizing the occasion to say, hi, I friended your journal a few weeks ago because you write the best character analysis in this fandom)

Thanks!!
ext_6866: (Hmmmm..)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
This is great I never even thought about this before, but it makes a perfect sense in the way we've seen families in HP world act. And not just purebloods. Though the Weasley's are, Harry wants to be a Weasley and they want to consider him one as well.

Yeah, families are amazingly important in this world. And leaving your own family is always a big risk. You seem to lose your biggest support system.

Sirius pulling the "Pureblood" card was also overlooked by me. I thought he was just being a jerk - which he was, but that's no reason to assume they weren't both trying to hit where it hurts from page one.

Yes, I'd never thought of it this way until just now. And you're right, Snape probably wouldn't ever say anything to Harry about his connections to them--I wonder if they're very important to him. They certainly could be, given HBP. Actually, that's kind of intriguing about Snape. Harry has noticed that he seems to favor Draco, for instance, but he's kept any thoughts about Sirius' family completely hidden from Harry, even while loudly going off on Sirius himself.

That's not really the kind of organization you go out together for picnic's to get to know one another better.

LOL! Yes--absolutely!
ext_6866: (Dreamy)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Yum yum yum! With the little information we have about the Snape/Black interactions, I think this post is as deep as we can get into the matter without becoming totally speculative.

Heh! Yes, I was really trying to reign in the speculation, since anything we imagine has to be that. There's precious little actual information there, but it does seem possible that the foundation is being laid for some.

I've always had very, very little interest in the house of Malfoy, mostly because Lucius for some reason is simply boring in my eyes (never got on the fanon bandwagon of Draco & his Malfoy Pride etc).

I was the same way, and it always sort of surprised me. I don't know whether it was that I found Lucius boring or not, but for some reason it always just seemed less interesting than I'd expect it to be. I jumped for joy to find them on that tapestry, though. It's also kind of interesting that in a way Lucius was such a misdirection. We're told Draco looks just like him, but what's tricky is that so does Narcissa. The blond hair could just as easily come from her, and those grey eyes...(can't remember--does Lucius have blue eyes or grey? Do we even know?)

I refuse to believe Kreacher's brief stalking job was just there to create comedy effect (though it *really* was funny).

Yes, I thought that too. There's not necesarily any reason to bring Kreacher to Hogwarts at all. Dobby could just as easily have done the tailing, and Harry heads-off any attempts by Kreacher to tip Draco off. So I wonder if there is a set-up there beyond just showing the different perspective of Kreacher.

Back to your main point- I think the case of Snape/Blacks is different from that of Sirius/Potters mainly in that Snape does seem to think positively of at least one of his parents. Thus, I don't think he would feel too keenly to be considered a 'somewhat' family member, since he certainly had not denounced his own the way Sirius did.

Yeah, see I don't think it was a case of Snape looking to be adopted as a son like Sirius or Harry with the Weasleys. But I can see him wanting to be considered a member of the Black family in terms of their being this important wizarding family, you know? He may actually have seen it as a way of validating his mother's status as well. It seems more about validation and respect than affection.
ext_6866: (I've been thinking.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
What if Reg is/was Draco's godfather?

Ahhhhh! For some reason this totally excites me. I admit I really am hoping for some Regulus/Draco bonding--as much as a dead person can bond with a live person. They just seem too set up to possibly illuminate each other, and Regulus is the one family member who would have totally understood Draco's position. I can imagine him being a source of strength for him for that reason.

And of course I'd love to know all about how Regulus fits into the previous generation. Sirius makes him sound like a non-entity, but he could very well be very important to Snape and have affected things with MWPP at the time. Did he know about Peter, I wonder? He might not have.
ext_6866: (I'm off.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL! This just made me grin.:-D
ext_6866: (I'm listening.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a fabulous theory. I'm still trying to process it all in my mind, because I'm so used to thinking of Snape bound to the Malfoy family, so it's a little odd to look at it from the Black family perpective.

Yes--there's a little misdirection there.

I still have reservations on the idea; aside from the aura of loneliness that seems to surround Snape's character throughout the books, I know it's been said before, but you really have to wonder if the family would be able to get past the blood issue in order to accept Snape.

Whatever relationship was there, I feel like this would have to be the center of it. It's typical of Snape, really, that he'd demand respect from a family that would withold it for a reason out of his control, but I can see him needing it that much more because of that. I mean, he's never been truly accepted into the Black family whatever happened--Narcissa appeals to him as Lucius' friend and Draco's favorite teacher. So I don't think we're talking about Snape being the Harry to the Black's Weasleys. But I can see him wanting to make himself important to them, even while cursing the fact his blood will always keep him out of the circle. As I said, he can't even *marry* into the family due to his blood status. But maybe that makes power in that household even more attractive to him.
ext_6866: (Good point.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I can almost see it, where Snape is the kid allowed to play with Pureblood Regulus, like all those children we just don't know in the news reels, being invited to Shirley Temple's birthday parties.

Hee! What a great comparison.

Also there's lots of examples of families who might be basically bigotted but still had certain people of unacceptable backgrounds as friends. They'd be aware that they weren't on the same level but could still appreciate them for what they were. For instance, they might find it very amusing for their son to have a Jewish friend, even knowing that marrying a Jew was unthinkable. I can see Snape occuping that sort of strange position.
ext_6866: (Cousins)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I admit I love it when Sirius sounds like Draco.:-)
ext_6866: (Diving in)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Snape, who already thinks Sirius to be arrogant (rightly so, by some indications), might have thought it the height of arrogance for someone who grew up with everything to throw it so blithely away.

Oh yeah-and look at the house where Snape lives in HBP!

Sirius definitely has all those intangible things, and those things are highlighted in HBP with the Slug Club. Yes, there are times when he reaches out to someone talented who isn't a Pureblood, but they are still the exception to the rule. Slughorn is always aware of their blood status. People have sometimes considered it important that he invites Hermione and not Draco, but I think people forget that he specifically doesn't invite Draco because he's hiding from DEs now. Lucius was a favorite of his, as was his grandfather. There are others in the Club who only have family connections--most of them, actually. And Hermione has connections as well--she's Harry's friend. That might play more of a part in her inclusion than she thinks. Slughorn might have been itching to invite her because she was Muggleborn, to show Harry how open-minded he is.

I wonder if Snape was even part of the Club, actually. I don't think Slughorn says so. He seems to know that Snapew as a gifted Potions student, but it's Lily he praises to the skies. I wonder if her looks and charisma had to do with that--he thinks Harry is a great Potions Genius too, and he's wrong.

And, as unfair as Snape can be to his own students, he still seems to keenly feel any unfairness directed at him.

And often when he's treating others unfairly he claims to be evening the score.
ext_6866: (Yum!)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!!! And I'm really glad you liked it.:-)
ext_6866: (Trio)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks--and link away.:-)

You really see when you look at the whole series how important it is to have a family, I think. It seems to be the basis of everything. A Muggleborn with no connections is really floating around, vulnerable, I think. Hermione really lucked out attaching herself to the Weasleys and Harry--and of course so did Harry luck out in getting the Weasleys. Though even he benefits from his own family connections.

It's kind of funny that Harry never looks into those connections, actually. I know he can't have any living relatives or else he wouldn't be stuck with the Dursleys, but the Potters ought to be related in some way to other Purebloods. It's just as a Muggleborn Harry doesn't really see those connections as clearly as the Purebloods do. At least Purebloods like the Blacks who are hyper-aware of this sort of thing.
ext_6866: (Good point.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Not sure I would say "just" stepped into a father's role; as Head of Slytherin House Snape has been in loco parentis to Draco for six years now, and is undoubtedly someone admired and looked up to by him. Draco may be projecting angst about Lucius' situation, but his emotional reaction to Snape suggests he feels far more comfortable being himself – saying what he thinks and feels – with Snape than he ever would with his actual father.

Hee-you're absolutely right. After I wrote that I realized it did sound wrong that way. I do think there's a lot of freedom in the way Draco speaks to Snape, and not in terms of Snape being an underling, I don't think. His relationship with his father was *so* controlled, from the little we saw. He was always controlling him, either by cutting him off, criticizing him or telling him what to do or think. Draco was always "my father says"-ing. I think Snape is a much better father figure in that he praises things Draco does well even while keeping him in line. Their interactions in HBP do very much seem like father and son, with Draco sometimes acting out and Snape having to just be there as the object.

If Draco is the Black who is going to come to a new understanding, it's probably a good thing that he doesn't see Snape through the lense of blood status--and I don't think he does. I don't want to play down Draco's bigotry or claim he just doesn't really believe it because it's not that simple. But I really do think that the groundwork is laid for Draco to have just never really *benefited* from blood prejudice the way others may have before him. He's seen Hermione beat him in everything, he sees Harry beat him at everything, he's the Malfoy who isn't liked by Slughorn, Voldemort gets his father thrown in jail. I think DD's telling him not to use the word Mudblood was important as well. Having to cut Snape off because he was a half-blood seems like the last thing Draco would want to do or could do. He really does respect the man, it seems, and I think he'd hate to lose that.
ext_6866: (Hmmmm..)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! Yeah, he does sound like Phineas, doesn't he!

[identity profile] pilly2009.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
And Snape shares in the Black family loathing all things Potter.

But -- and this is an issue I've carried around for a while, and figure I can probably bring up here -- does the Black family loathe the Potter family, at all, even in the same way as they loathe the Weasleys? The Weasleys and the Potters always seem to be lumped together in fandom for some reason, when I've never had any indication that they should be. The Weasleys were apparently blasted off of the tapestry a long time ago, but we only discovered this because Arthur Weasley, at least, is from a distant branch of the Black family. Whereas the Potters never have been on the tapestry (I'm assuming Sirius would have said something if they had been, and it's unlikely that every pureblooded family is linked in some way), so how can you be a blood traitor to a faction of purebloods you have never belonged to? The use of the term traitor is significant to the Weasleys, which is why I can see it generating hate and/or anger, as they were once a part of the family, but the significance lessens when applied in fandom to the Potters.

Thus, if we can assume that hate for the Potters doesn't generate from any traitorous aspect of their conduct, what does it generate from? Or...does it generate at all? We have nothing to indicate that there are any sort of feelings between both families, whether in distant past or in Marauder-era past. Mrs. Black has no significant reaction to Harry that she doesn't have to every other member of the Order, despite his looking like the boy who apparently "seduced" her son away from the dark side; Kreacher's initial reaction to both Harry's name and person is curiousity over the kid who defeated Voldemort (later becoming disgust over ; we don't even know for sure whether Regulus was resentful towards James Potter for his friendship with Sirius, any more than we know whether Bellatrix's taunting of "baby Potter" was on behalf of her lord or her family, or whether Sirius joining the Potter family was a cause or a consequence of being blasted off of the tapestry.

There just doesn't seem to be much of a history present, even when including Sirius's defection.
ext_6866: (Yum!)

Re: Here from daily_snitch.

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Icon love!!

I love the Black brothers too--even when we just had that one line to go on, I thought Sirius' casual dismissal of Regulus was masking something very different underneath.

Snape and Regulus bonding in the wake of Sirius' defection is just full of delicious possibilities. Snape would have to tread carefully, I think, in the way that Snape could. Because no matter what the bad blood between them, I just instinctively feel that there would be some bond there. After all, Regulus was the Black who was sickened by Voldemort's methods, and his love for family and Sirius may have contributed to that. So I think Snape would be aware of the bond between them and probably watching it change over the years.

I do hope we find out more about Regulus in the next book, and that he and Draco sort of illuminate each other. It seems like Regulus is the family member who could most understand what Draco's going through, so it's a shame that Draco maybe doesn't know that. I find myself hoping that the R.A.B. note somehow connects to Draco in some way. Not that Draco had anything to do with it, obviously, but that the fact that Regulus took the horcrux is something Draco must know for some reason--and Snape would be a great person to tell us about that, if he knows it.
ext_6866: (I'm off.)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! What a nice thing to say!
ext_6866: (Me)

Re: Here from the DS

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks! I'm really glad you liked it.
ext_6866: (Hmmmm..)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Very true. I think Neville's family is a good model to look at here. According to all we know he's very much a Pureblood from an important family, but his family doesn't seem to excite much passion from either side.

[identity profile] arwencordelia.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Slughorn's take on Muggleborns is kind of indicative of his pureblood pov, I think... he's *very* impressed by Lily, but when talking to Harry, he still sounds a bit surprised that a muggleborn should be so talented.

I think his preference for Lily and indifference for Snape has to do with more than their blood status; from what little we've seen, Snape-the-teenager was not exactly charming. Slughorn might have not thought his enough of a "high-flyer", like Arthur Weasley. Any help or useful connections that Lily might have received from being in the "Slug Club" were not available to Snape.

And to bring this back to Sirius... Lily and Snape were both in a position to need the "leg-up" from Slughorn. For Sirius, I think it was entirely optional (if I'm correct in thinking that his family name/reputation would have opened any door for him).
ext_6866: (Diving in)

Part 1

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
You know what I would love to see? A fic or a meta reading that seriously addressed the possibility that the Great Epic of the WW, the one with real scope and grandeur and all that, is not the Potter story at all, but the Fall and Redemption of the House of Black.

LOL! You know I'd love that--in fact, my own meta seems to be edging closer to that all the time. It's nice if Harry grows up and defeats Voldemort and all but those BLACKS are where the action is for me. I don't think it's so bizarre an idea given the Sorting Hat's warnings about bringing Slytherin back into the fold. It's just got to be important that we're given an entire family of Voldemort supporters in a crumbling house whose one chance seems to be Voldemort's defeat. It's a big reason it always seems too tragic for Draco to die or not be redeemed at all. It's not just about this one kid, it's about this family. A family that has been shown to not be all bad. Maybe if we were still operating on the level of CoS where the Malfoys just seemed like the wicked family you could see their destruction being a happy ending, but not the Blacks. There's nothing gained if they don't learn the error of their ways and pay for them in some way. Tonks doesn't count; she's an outsider.

Behind your theory about Snape and the Blacks, I also sense a healthy resistance to the exaggerated role of Lucius in the fandom imagination.

Heh--noticed that, did you? Yeah. It's funny because in a way Lucius *might* (just might--you never know what Book VII will bring) play the role so many people assigned to Draco-the minor villain who's a warm-up for Voldemort. When you look at his story now, his main role has been connected to Book VI-he destroyed a horcrux (and blew the Prophecy mission) and thus left Draco vulnerable. What a surprise for people that he wound up staying in jail and by all reports was happy to be safe there, removed from all the action. WE even keep hearing how he's happy for his own safety-a big contrast to Narcissa risking her life to protect Draco, or Draco seeming so driven to avenge his father and prove himself.

He's just been such a misdirection, though, because he's always had such tight control over Draco. Their one scene together has Lucius always controlling him in some way: don't touch, be quiet, don't make excuses, don't talk about Potter. And Draco himself was always, "My father says X,Y Z," to little effect. Now it seems like maybe Draco, under the superficial Lucius mannerisms, was always his mother's boy. We don't have enough insight to really know his thoughts on Lucius in HBP, but I imagine they're very conflicted. I can see him relating to him the way a Black would.

So: Snape, embittered half-blood, sort of lets himself dally with the idea of being considered an honorary Black, perhaps makes an investment in that role, only to find that he is never quite accepted, that they turn to him for help but don't quite honor him fully.

I can just really see Snape intentionally getting himself into this double bind. He feels he *has* to be part of a Pureblood family because they're what matters. He joins the DEs. He makes himself useful to them. But the very thing they are keeps him from really joining them--they're all about blood ties, and he hasn't got the blood. I don't think this was necessarily about affection for Snape but respect. It's just the lot of that kind of character to see the real sons fuck up while his competence only gets him so far. Suddenly I'm picturing him as Robert Duvall in The Godfather.? He's their consigliore. He has a specific place in the family, but he's not a Corleone. Still, he is bound to them as is loyal to them in a family-type way. And family is very important for these types--Corleone or Black.

[identity profile] arwencordelia.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
This was interesting to me, as well. Slughorn must have heard of the Weasleys (whose reputation sometimes seems to precede them in the WW, and not always favorably). So why did he decide that a Weasley was worth knowing and helping?

Ginny Weasley (unlike Ron) must have appeared headstrong, self-possessed, and not afraid to take her chances when Slughorn came across her on the train. I'll hazard a guess that Ginny may be mistaking Slughorn's motives here... the Bat Bogey hex might have drawn his attention, but I think it was Ginny's attitude, and not the curse itself, that Slughorn found attractive and worth fostering/encouraging.
ext_6866: (Diving in)

Part 2

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Pilly made a good point in asking if the Blacks really do hate all things Potter. Consider that they don't. If the Potters were always considered a good family, even if people like James pick the wrong side in the war, that would make Snape even more irritated. James, like Sirius, was born into what he wants. The aristocracy have more freedom to make dumb choices.

Pilly spoke of the Weasleys being traitors and that really is an interesting idea. It feels like (and maybe this is just by accident) the Weasleys have done something beyond just supporting Muggle Protection acts. Is it the way they live, their lack of class? I don't know, but they almost act like the Weasleys have committed some taboo beyond marrying the wrong person. (After all; they haven't. Andromeda is blasted off for marrying a Muggleborn, but the Weasleys are still completely Pure at this point.) Is it just for plot purposes? Maybe. I've never been able, for instance, to get around the fact that Draco doesn't seem to find anything wrong with Harry's blood. Is that just related to Draco's ambivalence about Pureblood mania (as I described in the post where I talked about that--that's not to diminish it or claim Draco doesn't really believe it, just that there are times he seems to deal with the reality that it's nonsense).

Btw, to get away from the idea again, I can't help but find it really neat and significant that the families of our two Pureblood MWPP heroes were the Potters and the Blacks. Malfoy is French--Norman, it sounds. So is LeStrange. Many of the DE names seem foreign or Anglicanized. Black and Potter are not only very British but, if I'm not mistaken, they're both tradesman names. A potter is one who makes pots. A Black is a blacksmith (I think Smith can come from different types of smith-black, silver, etc.) Sirius could easily have been called Sirius Smith. That just somehow seems interesting to me--they're not exactly what we would think of as aristocratic names. I can't help but feel like a Draco who was a Malfoy-LeStrange (heh-or Malfoy-Peltier) would lack the metal the one in canon has.
ext_6866: (Looking more closely)

[identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com 2005-09-08 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
That's much the way I saw it. I think Lily's sparkling personality was part of her charm as well as her Potions genius. I don't even know if Snape was in the Slug Club, even if Slughorn at one point seems to say, "Why, even Severus..." about Lily's Potions making. It seems like Snape, frankly, is the kind of kid who might be turned down despite talent or even connections. Neville is invited early on but I don't think he continues to be.

Not to make Snape sound like a poor victim here. It's just that I don't think Lily and Hermione's being included in the Club really prove that Slughorn doesn't have a lot of Prejudice. He does seem to consider Lily's status a big deal, and he may reach out to Hermione partly because she's Harry's friend (thus connected) and partly because she's Harry's Muggleborn friend (whom Harry brought up himself). He may notice her not only because of her skills but because he's making a point to Harry and luring him in. It works, too, in terms of the fact that Hermione tries to get Harry interested in the meetings.

Page 2 of 5