WTF Tonks?

[sistermagpie]

So mere weeks before the release of DH I somehow have something to say about a storyline in HBP. It's two years late, but I need to pick every bone. I was reading stuff today about strong and weak characters, some of which I disagreed with, and unsurprisingly the Tonks storyline came up. I'm not really taking a position here on whether the story was good or bad for whatever reasons, but what I do think was that

Tonks storyline was useful for several reasons in terms of what JKR needed in the plot:

It gives Lupin, the last Marauder, a happy ending, which JKR may have wanted to do for its own sake.

It gives her another way to keep Sirius talked about through Hermione's false conclusion that Tonks was in love with Sirius. Any way to get Sirius in is good, imo, because I think he'll be coming up again in DH.

What it adds to the Fleur vs. The Weasleys storyline. It gives JKR a way to show that the female Weasleys feel about Fleur is obvious. Fleur's negativity is clear in her comments about the radio and the house, but the fact that it's so believable and acceptable that Mrs. Weasley might be trying to set Lupin up with another woman sets up Fleur's anger in the end because although we might have cheered them on (or not) we have seen the Weasleys being unwelcoming and obvious they don't want her in the family. When Fleur accuses them of "'oping" the engagement will end now that Bill is injured, it can't be denied, because they've been 'oping so much it seemed believable that Molly was actively trying to break them up.

These last two I think are cool, because they get into Rowling's mysteries (link to a past post that can be skipped), and also a paper I loved at Phoenix Rising about how Rowling uses repetition. Whenever there's a revelation in the books, the elements of it are probably going to have been presented to us already in some other way. In Tonks' case it gives JKR a way to show two things that will be important in other storylines:

It shows someone losing their powers due to stress. Yeah, it could be unfortunate they're both women and it's for love, but love is after all a big theme in HBP. And Rowling has to some way show the possibility of someone losing their powers. Being a Metamophagus, Tonks is a good candidate for this, because she's the only witch who walks around with a sign of her powers that people can see all the time. When her hair goes mousy when she's usually kept it pink, it's like Harry can see her "power" light isn't on. (At the same time, she does retain her basic magic power, so it's not like she becomes useless. She just telegraphs that powers can be lost this way. I wouldn't be surprised if this was the whole reason for giving her the power.

At the same time, Tonks is not losing her powers over lost love. She's lost her powers because she's worried she *will* lose someone she loves. And that's the other storyline she's illuminating, which is the Draco one. When I first read HBP for a while I wondered if Voldemort hadn't put some sort of wasting-away curse on the Black family. Turns out it wasn't genetic, except that Tonks had inherited the Black gene for suffering operatically. Harry does specifically connect Tonks and Draco the second time he notices Draco's physical decline, saying he's lost weight "like Tonks." Ultimately they are deteriorating for the same reason, worry that they will lose their loved ones. (Though of course Draco's also worried about himself, and got other issues.)

Anyway, that's my defense of the Tonks storyline, or at least what I think it's doing there. It's kind of reflecting a lot of minor issues about other storylines, and presenting certain technical things that are important elsewhere.

Comments

[sistermagpie.livejournal.com]

It's funny how much I was into this idea of a family curse in HBP before I realized it wasn't right. I just really wanted their connection to be made explicit--Harry knows they're related on an intellectual level, but really doesn't accept it.

To answer lunacy a little, Gryffindors do get obsessed with things too, but Slytherin is that water house and they really do seem to do emotion in a different way when they do it--operatically, I always think. I guess the simplest way is to say water vs. fire. Tonks is probably more an earth/water combo than earth/fire. She's been tempered a bit more than the rest of her family. Sirius is maybe Fire/Water?

I feel like I'm probably just talking out of my ass with that, but it sounds good!

[yourpoison.livejournal.com]

I like the water/fire and earth/water thing-- I suppose you could say it's the innate wateri...ness of the Blacks and their Slytherin heritage being ameliorated by Gryffindor (fire) and Hufflepuff (earth) influences, respectively. And I never argued that Slytherins 'do emotion' differently-- I actually said that first thing, what with being 'unable to let go' for different reasons. :> All I was saying is that Tonks isn't water or really that Slytherin in her behavior, though there's that Black/watery family influence still visible! :) I mean... well, literally, she's a lot more down to earth. :>

Slytherins do emotion differently, yes. I suppose you could say they drown in it half the time when they're not constructing implements or walls of ice or perhaps damming it up for the ages :> Tonks with her mousy hair and her moping... not very operatic :> Sort of melodramatic in a lame embarrassing way, haha.

Arg, I've got to get out of this thread before someone flames me for real or I say something really embarrassing. :)) For the record, I like operatic emotion. ^^;;;