yes *claps hands* that's exactly it. my canon's more canon than yours :-)
seriously, though, it's a bit unsettling the way canonicity and IC gets wielded as a weapon when the most fascinating thing about ff is that other thing (at least to me..if i wantto read rowling, i read wrowling...i read ff to *not* read her, y'know :-)
and that doesn't mean that everyone's limits are someplace else (or, as you say, everyone's individual interpretation isn't). but we shouldn't dismiss X b/c it's not Y or too much X or whatever :-)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-04-29 08:27 am (UTC)seriously, though, it's a bit unsettling the way canonicity and IC gets wielded as a weapon when the most fascinating thing about ff is that other thing (at least to me..if i wantto read rowling, i read wrowling...i read ff to *not* read her, y'know :-)
and that doesn't mean that everyone's limits are someplace else (or, as you say, everyone's individual interpretation isn't). but we shouldn't dismiss X b/c it's not Y or too much X or whatever :-)